Development and Validation of a Model Explaining the Relationship Between Environmental Quality and Collective Behaviors in Urban Public Spaces: A Case Study of District 5, Tehran

Authors

Keywords:

Environmental Quality, Collective Behavior, Urban Public Spaces, Urban Vitality, Social Interaction, Place Attachment, Tehran District 5

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and validate a comprehensive model explaining the relationship between environmental quality dimensions and collective behavioral patterns in urban public spaces in District 5 of Tehran. A mixed-method research design was employed. In the qualitative phase, data were collected through semi-structured interviews with experts in urban design, urban planning, environmental psychology, and experienced users of public spaces. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis, resulting in the extraction of 15 overarching themes, 35 organizing themes, and numerous primary themes. In the quantitative phase, a questionnaire was developed based on the qualitative findings and administered to 442 residents and users of urban public spaces in District 5 of Tehran. Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling were used to evaluate the measurement and structural models. Reliability, convergent validity, discriminant validity, and model fit indices were also assessed. The confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that all identified dimensions had significant factor loadings and t-values exceeding the critical threshold of 1.96. Cronbach’s alpha coefficients ranged from 0.845 to 0.877, composite reliability values exceeded 0.88, and average variance extracted values were above 0.66, confirming strong reliability and validity. The coefficients of determination indicated that place attachment (R²=0.656), environmental comfort (R²=0.640), and aesthetics (R²=0.640) exhibited the highest explanatory power among the constructs. Furthermore, the final model achieved a Goodness-of-Fit (GOF) value of 0.642, indicating excellent overall model fit and strong predictive capability. The findings indicate that environmental quality dimensions, including accessibility, perceived safety, spatial flexibility, diversity of activities and land uses, environmental comfort, legibility, aesthetics, and social life, play a crucial role in shaping collective behaviors, social interactions, urban vitality, and place attachment. Improving the quality of urban public spaces can therefore strengthen social sustainability, civic engagement, and overall urban quality of life.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Carmona M. Public Places Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design. 4th ed. London: Routledge; 2021.

2. Gehl J. Public Space and Collective Life. Soheilipour MS, Ghaffari A, editors. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University Press; 2002.

3. Berman A. The Social Life of Urban Spaces: Contemporary Approaches to Public Realm Design. New York: Routledge; 2020.

4. Cooper Marcus C, Francis C. People Places: Design Guidelines for Urban Open Space. Updated edition ed. New York: Wiley; 2017.

5. Kardaki M. Behavior Settings in Urban Spaces: A Contemporary Environmental Psychology Approach. London: Routledge; 2021.

6. Razavinia M. Modeling the Factors Affecting the Formation of Behavior Settings in Urban Parks. Iranian City Studies Quarterly. 2018;9(1):77-96.

7. Lee K. Walkable Cities: Urban Design for Health, Equity and Sustainability. New York: Bloomsbury; 2021.

8. Zhang Q. Human Behavior in Urban Spaces: Activity Patterns and Spatial Design. Singapore: Springer; 2019.

9. Nash-Anderson K. Environmental Cues and Social Behavior in Public Spaces. London: Routledge; 2023.

10. Kent J, Thompson S. Planning Australia: An Overview of Urban and Regional Planning. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2020.

11. Taylor E. Urban Social Sustainability: Theory, Policy and Practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2022.

12. Kaplan R, Kaplan S, Ryan R. With People in Mind: Design and Management of Everyday Nature. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2015.

13. Marcus E. People Places: Design Guidelines for Urban Open Space. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley; 2018.

14. Karami MR. Investigating the Relationship between Environmental Legibility and Collective Behaviors in Urban Open Spaces. Journal of Architecture and Environment. 2018;15(2):11-30.

15. Perez-Gomez A. Attunement: Architectural Meaning after the Crisis of Modern Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2019.

16. Saeedi Rezvani N. Quality of Urban Spaces and Its Behavioral Consequences: A Human-Centered Approach. Journal of Urban Planning Engineering. 2015;6(4):55-76.

17. Kalantari B. Investigating Collective Space and the Creative City. Manzar Quarterly. 2012;4(19).

18. Mosallinejad F, Mohseni R. Comparative Analysis of Behavioral Signs in Urban Pedestrian Streets with Emphasis on Social Interactions. Environment and Identity Quarterly. 2022;22(1):91-115.

19. Esfandiari A. Analysis of the Role of Environmental Quality in Promoting Social Behaviors in Urban Public Spaces. Journal of Architectural and Urban Planning Research. 2020;12(3):45-62.

Downloads

Published

1405-03-20

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Gholamian, M. . ., Habib, F., Majedi, H., & Zabihi, H. (1405). Development and Validation of a Model Explaining the Relationship Between Environmental Quality and Collective Behaviors in Urban Public Spaces: A Case Study of District 5, Tehran. Manifestation of Art in Architecture and Urban Engineering, 4(1), 1-24. https://jmaaue.org/index.php/jmaaue/article/view/198

Similar Articles

1-10 of 144

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.