Explaining the Artistic and Perceptual Components of Heritage Landscape in Urban Branding of Kerman Using the DANP Model

Authors

Keywords:

Urban branding, heritage landscape, artistic qualities, DANP model, Kerman

Abstract

The present study aimed to explain the artistic and perceptual components of the heritage landscape affecting the urban branding of Kerman and to analyze the causal relationships among these components using the integrated DANP model. This applied study adopted a descriptive–analytical design with an exploratory–explanatory mixed-method approach. In the qualitative phase, the components of the heritage landscape were identified and localized through a systematic review of theoretical literature, qualitative content analysis, and interviews with 15 experts in landscape architecture, urban planning, cultural heritage, and urban management. In the quantitative phase, a pairwise comparison questionnaire based on a 0–4 scale was distributed among 20 specialists. Data analysis was conducted using DEMATEL and ANP techniques within the DANP framework to determine the intensity, direction, and priority of relationships among the variables. Content validity was evaluated through CVR and CVI indices, while reliability was confirmed using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient above 0.85. The findings identified seven major components influencing urban branding in Kerman, including historical identity and authenticity, urban symbols and landmarks, integrated landscape management and policymaking, spatial organization and legibility, visual quality and artistic proportions, mental image and memorability, and stakeholder participation. DEMATEL analysis revealed that landscape policymaking and management had the strongest causal influence (+1.24), whereas stakeholder participation had the highest level of dependency (−1.01). In addition, the mental image of the city demonstrated the highest systemic interaction (7.35) with other variables. DANP results indicated that historical identity and authenticity (0.182), urban symbols and landmarks (0.164), and landscape policymaking and management (0.151) possessed the highest final weights in the urban branding process. Visual quality and artistic proportions acted as an intermediate and reinforcing layer connecting physical form to meaning and perception. The results demonstrated that urban branding in Kerman is fundamentally rooted in historical identity, authenticity of the heritage landscape, and the representation of urban symbols, while the city’s mental image emerges as the final outcome of interactions among identity-based, managerial, and spatial factors. The proposed three-layer model showed that policymaking and historical identity function as driving forces, visual quality serves as an intermediary factor, and mental image together with stakeholder participation constitute the final outcomes. Therefore, preserving the authenticity of historical textures, enhancing spatial legibility, integrating artistic qualities into urban design, and implementing integrated heritage landscape policies can significantly strengthen Kerman’s urban brand.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Kotler P, Haider DH, Rein I. Marketing places: Attracting investment, industry, and tourism to cities, states, and nations: The Free Press; 1993.

2. Anholt S. Competitive identity: The new brand management for nations, cities and regions: Palgrave Macmillan; 2007.

3. Ashworth GJ, Kavaratzis M. Towards effective place brand management: Branding European cities and regions: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2010.

4. Dinnie K. City branding: Theory and cases: Palgrave Macmillan; 2011.

5. Zenker S, Braun E. Urban identity and place branding. Cities. 2023;132:104-18.

6. Kavaratzis M. Rethinking the place brand: The interactive formation of place brands and the role of participatory place branding. Environment and Planning A. 2020;53(1):1-17.

7. Govers R. Imaginative communities: Admired cities, regions and countries. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy. 2020;16(3):197-205.

8. Zenker S, Braun E, Petersen S. Branding the destination versus the place: The effects of brand complexity on city branding. Tourism Management. 2021;82:104150.

9. Kavaratzis M, Ashworth GJ. Heritage and city branding. Research handbook on city branding: Edward Elgar; 2022. p. 45-62.

10. Relph E. Place and placelessness: Pion; 1976.

11. Norberg-Schulz C. Genius loci: Towards a phenomenology of architecture: Rizzoli; 1980.

12. Unesco. Recommendation on the historic urban landscape. UNESCO World Heritage Centre; 2021.

13. Ripp M, Clifford J. Heritage-based urban development. Encyclopedia. 2025;5(2):82-101.

14. Lynch K. The image of the city: MIT Press; 1960.

15. Cullen G. Townscape: Architectural Press; 1961.

16. Stylidis D. Residents' place image: A cluster analysis and its links to place attachment and support for tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 2020;28(7):1007-26.

17. Ahmadi S, Rostami M. Explaining the role of city branding in enhancing the mental image of the city from citizens' perspectives: A case study of Tabriz. Urban Management Research. 2022;14(2):45-64.

18. Vosoughi L, Abdoli M, Khazaei F, Sarani M. Analysis of city branding capacity and brand elements in a tourism destination based on an identity-based approach. Urban Tourism Quarterly. 2020;7(3):143-59.

19. Rafieian M, Ghazaei M, Ghazi R. Branding and competition in the global arena with emphasis on the mental images of Mashhad citizens. Advances in Cognitive Sciences. 2020;21(1):87-104.

20. Boisen M, Terlouw K, Groote P, Couwenberg O. Reframing place promotion, place marketing and place branding. Cities. 2022;121:103430.

21. Oliveira E, Ashworth G. Place branding in strategic spatial planning: A systematic literature review. Journal of Place Management and Development. 2021;14(3):292-309.

22. Mohammadi Aydoghmish F, Rafieian M. Developing a comprehensive conceptual framework for city branding based on urban planning theory: Meta-synthesis of the literature (1990-2020). Cities. 2022;128:100-14.

23. Yazdanpanah MR, Sajadzadeh H, Rafieian M. Explaining the conceptual model of place branding: A review of the theoretical literature. Bagh-e Nazar. 2019;16(71):19-34.

24. Mansouri SA, Hemmati M. Evaluation of Persian-speaking researchers' interpretations in expressing the concept of the spatial organization of the city. Bagh-e Nazar. 2020;17(92):5-18.

25. Abbasi F. Components of urban identity in Kerman. Human Geography Studies. 2024;15(1):81-102.

26. Aslani N, Kazemi F. Evaluation of city brand components with emphasis on historical-cultural identity: A case study of Kerman. Human Geography Studies. 2023;15(1):81-102.

27. Zarehnejad S, Mirzaei M. The role of heritage landscape components in strengthening city branding: A case study of the historical fabric of Kerman. Cultural Heritage and Tourism Studies. 2023;10(3):83-102.

28. Sevin E. Two ways to see a city: The impact of social media on city branding. Journal of Place Management and Development. 2020;13(3):325-42.

Downloads

Published

1405-04-01

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Tadayon Saeedi , S. ., Toofan, S., & Sattari Sarbangoli , H. . (1405). Explaining the Artistic and Perceptual Components of Heritage Landscape in Urban Branding of Kerman Using the DANP Model. Manifestation of Art in Architecture and Urban Engineering, 1-18. https://jmaaue.org/index.php/jmaaue/article/view/211

Similar Articles

11-20 of 116

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.