تحلیل ابعاد مؤثر بر تاب‌آوری مجتمع‌های مسکونی در بافت‌های فرسوده: مطالعه موردی سنندج

مژان نامداری; الهام فاطمی; محمد بهزادپور; عترت لعل بخش

Authors

Mozhan Namdari Department of Architecture, Sav.C., Islamic Azad University, Saveh, Iran Author https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4051-2961
Elham Fatemi Department of Architecture, Sa.C., Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0402-4012
Mohammad Behzadpour Department of Architecture, Has.C, Islamic Azad University, Hashtgerd, Iran Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9790-6997
Etrat Lalbakhsh Department of Architecture, Ka.C., Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6634-8750

Keywords:

Urban Resilience, Distressed Urban Fabric, Structural Equation Modeling (PLS, SEM), Network Governance, Sanandaj

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the dimensions affecting the resilience of residential complexes in the deteriorated urban fabrics of Sanandaj and to determine the effects of social, institutional–managerial, economic, and physical–environmental dimensions on residential resilience. This applied study employed a quantitative descriptive–analytical design. The statistical population consisted of residents of residential complexes and housing units located in the deteriorated urban fabrics of Sanandaj. A total of 395 residents were selected using simple random sampling. Data were collected using a researcher-developed questionnaire covering the physical–environmental, social, economic, institutional–managerial, and resilience constructs. Content validity was assessed by experts, while construct, convergent, and discriminant validity were examined through measurement-model evaluation. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha and composite reliability. Data were analyzed using SPSS and partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in SmartPLS. Structural model analysis showed that the social dimension had a positive and significant effect on resilience (β=0.376, t=5.081, P<0.001). Significant positive effects were also observed for the institutional–managerial dimension (β=0.331, t=4.662, P<0.001), economic dimension (β=0.284, t=4.239, P<0.001), and physical–environmental dimension (β=0.219, t=3.712, P<0.001). The social dimension was the strongest predictor, whereas the physical–environmental dimension showed the smallest path coefficient. The coefficient of determination was R²=0.486, indicating that the four dimensions jointly explained 48.6% of the variance in resilience. Moreover, Q²=0.318 demonstrated satisfactory predictive relevance of the model. The resilience of residential complexes in the deteriorated urban fabrics of Sanandaj is a multidimensional construct jointly shaped by social, institutional–managerial, economic, and physical–environmental factors. The dominant role of the social dimension highlights the importance of strengthening social capital, neighborhood participation, and community relationships alongside institutional capacity and economic support. Nevertheless, the relatively unfavorable condition of the physical–environmental dimension indicates that structural rehabilitation, infrastructure improvement, and enhancement of urban form should remain major priorities for achieving sustainable resilience.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Meerow S, Newell JP, Stults M. Defining Urban Resilience: A Review. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2016;147:38-49.

2. Mehmood A. Of Resilient Places: Planning for Urban Resilience. European Planning Studies. 2016;24(2):407-19.

3. Spaans M, Waterhout B. Building up Resilience in Cities Worldwide: Rotterdam as Participant in the 100 Resilient Cities Programme. Cities. 2017;61:109-16.

4. Meerow S, Newell JP. Urban Resilience for Whom, What, When, Where, and Why? Urban Geography. 2019;40(3):309-29.

5. Kobe City C. Lessons Learned from the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake: Kobe, Japan. Kobe City Council; 2008.

6. Li X. Measuring County Resilience after the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science. 2016;7(4):393-412.

7. Normandin JM, Therrien MC, Tanguay GA, editors. City Strength in Times of Turbulence: Strategic Resilience Indicators. Joint Conference on City Futures; 2009; Madrid.

8. Kammouh O, Noori AZ, Taurino V, Mahin SA, Cimellaro GP. Deterministic and Fuzzy-Based Methods to Evaluate Community Resilience. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration. 2018;17:261-75.

9. Mavhura E, Manyangadze T, Raj K. A Composite Inherent Resilience Index for Zimbabwe: An Adaptation of the Disaster Resilience of Place Model. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2021.

10. Kärrholm M, Nylund K, de la Fuente PP. Spatial Resilience and Urban Planning: Addressing the Interdependence of Urban Retail Areas. Cities. 2014;36:121-30.

11. Kodag S, Shibu K, Mani G, Balamurugan, Bera S. Earthquake and Flood Resilience through Spatial Planning in the Complex Urban System. Progress in Disaster Science. 2022;14.

12. Prawiranegara M. Spatial Multi-Criteria Analysis (SMCA) for Basin-Wide Flood Risk Assessment as a Tool in Improving Spatial Planning and Urban Resilience Policy Making: A Case Study of Marikina River Basin, Metro Manila, Philippines. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014;135:18.

13. Mohanty SK, Chatterjee R, Shaw R. Building Resilience of Critical Infrastructure: A Case of Impacts of Cyclones on the Power Sector in Odisha. Climate. 2020;8(6).

14. Naphade M, Banavar G, Harrison C, Paraszczak J, Morris R. Smarter Cities and Their Innovation Challenges. Computer. 2011;44(6):32-9.

15. Martin AS. A Framework to Understand the Relationship between Social Factors that Reduce Resilience in Cities: Application to the City of Boston. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2015.

16. Habibi SM, Maghsoudi M. Urban Restoration: Definitions, Theories, Experiences, International Charters and Resolutions, Methods, and Urban Actions. Tehran: University of Tehran Press; 2009.

17. Abdali Y, Rajaei SA. Determining the Components of Physical Resilience in the Residential Fabric of Bojnord City Using Moran's Spatial Autocorrelation Analysis. Urban Research and Planning Quarterly. 2019;10(39):1-16.

18. Ahadnejad Roshani M, Rostaei S, Kameli Far MJ. Assessment of Urban Street Network Vulnerability to Earthquakes with a Crisis Management Approach: Case Study of District 1 of Tabriz City. Geographical Information Quarterly. 2015;24.

19. Ahmadi M, Andalib A, Majedi H, Zarabadi S, Al-Sadat SZ. Assessing the Physical-Social Resilience of Historical Deteriorated Fabric with Emphasis on Sustainable Urban Form Using the Mean Distance from the Optimal Limit Method: A Case Study of Tehran Historical-Fabric Neighborhoods. Haft Hesar Environmental Studies. 2020;8(32):1-16.

20. Amra O. Presenting Housing Design Strategies in Deteriorated Urban Fabric with a Resilience Approach. Geography and Human Relationships. 2022;5(1):255-72.

21. Roozitalab T, Sadeghi AR, Daadgar M. Assessment of Urban Areas Based on Physical Resilience Indicators: A Case Study of Historical Fabric of Shiraz City. Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR). 2025;13(3):91-108.

22. Bordbar Taher Gourabi M, Eskandari M, Nasiri Hendeh Khaleh E, Hosseini SA. Factors Affecting Physical Resilience with Emphasis on Environmental Components: A Case Study of Saghari Sazan Neighborhood, Rasht. Geographical Engineering of Territory. 2025;9(3):141-58.